These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17288620)

  • 21. Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information.
    Graham DJ; Jeffery RW
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Nov; 111(11):1704-11. PubMed ID: 22027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Colour Me In--an empirical study on consumer responses to the traffic light signposting system in nutrition labelling.
    Hieke S; Wilczynski P
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):773-82. PubMed ID: 22115180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review.
    Cowburn G; Stockley L
    Public Health Nutr; 2005 Feb; 8(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 15705241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Snacks With Nutrition Labels: Tastiness Perception, Healthiness Perception, and Willingness to Pay by Norwegian Adolescents.
    Wang Q; Oostindjer M; Amdam GV; Egelandsdal B
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2016 Feb; 48(2):104-11.e1. PubMed ID: 26508499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberto CA; Bragg MA; Schwartz MB; Seamans MJ; Musicus A; Novak N; Brownell KD
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Aug; 43(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22813677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Initial Development and Evaluation of the Food Processing Knowledge (FoodProK) Score: A Functional Test of Nutrition Knowledge Based on Level of Processing.
    Bhawra J; Kirkpatrick SI; Hall MG; Vanderlee L; Hammond D
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Aug; 121(8):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 33612435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nutrition labels influence value computation of food products in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
    Enax L; Hu Y; Trautner P; Weber B
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2015 Apr; 23(4):786-92. PubMed ID: 25755174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of a Nutrient Rich Foods consumer education program: results from the nutrition advice study.
    Glanz K; Hersey J; Cates S; Muth M; Creel D; Nicholls J; Fulgoni V; Zaripheh S
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Jan; 112(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 22717177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advantages of graphical nutrition facts label: faster attention capture and improved healthiness judgement.
    Gao Z; Li Z; Zhuang X; Ma G
    Ergonomics; 2023 May; 66(5):627-643. PubMed ID: 35894181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationships among food label use, motivation, and dietary quality.
    Miller LM; Cassady DL; Applegate EA; Beckett LA; Wilson MD; Gibson TN; Ellwood K
    Nutrients; 2015 Feb; 7(2):1068-80. PubMed ID: 25665157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies.
    Kleef EV; Dagevos H
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 24915389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simply adding the word "fruit" makes sugar healthier: The misleading effect of symbolic information on the perceived healthiness of food.
    Sütterlin B; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():252-61. PubMed ID: 26184340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Māori, Pacific and low-income shoppers.
    Signal L; Lanumata T; Robinson JA; Tavila A; Wilton J; Ni Mhurchu C
    Public Health Nutr; 2008 Jul; 11(7):706-13. PubMed ID: 18167165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of different formats of front-of-pack nutrition labels according to sociodemographic, lifestyle and dietary factors in a French population: cross-sectional study among the NutriNet-Santé cohort participants.
    Julia C; Péneau S; Buscail C; Gonzalez R; Touvier M; Hercberg S; Kesse-Guyot E
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e016108. PubMed ID: 28619781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adult consumers' understanding and use of information on food labels: a study among consumers living in the Potchefstroom and Klerksdorp regions, South Africa.
    Jacobs SA; de Beer H; Larney M
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Mar; 14(3):510-22. PubMed ID: 20939940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consumer knowledge and attitudes toward nutritional labels.
    Cannoosamy K; Pugo-Gunsam P; Jeewon R
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 24933235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Food labelling to advance better education for life.
    Bonsmann SS; Celemín LF; Grunert KG;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Nov; 64 Suppl 3():S14-9. PubMed ID: 21045843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.