136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728923)
41. Precommitment issues in bioethics.
Robertson JA
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1849-76. PubMed ID: 15478266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Autonomy, advance directives, and artificial nutrition and hydration.
Rousseau P
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2004; 21(4):254. PubMed ID: 15315186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Difficult decisions. Respecting a patient's right to refuse treatment.
Hall SA
JEMS; 1994 May; 19(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 10133764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Practicing the PSDA.
Rouse F; Johnson S; Brock DW; Emanuel L; Wolf SM; Mason D; Mezey M; Purtilo RB; McCloskey EL
Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(5):S1-16. PubMed ID: 11642934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Legal review: The Patient Self-Determination Act--"Miranda" rights in health care.
Gaughan MC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 10112164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Physicians' obligations to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
Wollin DA; Avanzato J
R I Med; 1994 Nov; 77(11):387-9. PubMed ID: 7812057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Informed consent issues in home care.
Sheppard D
Caring; 1997 Mar; 16(3):46-9. PubMed ID: 10166266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Durable power of attorney versus the advance directive: who wins, who suffers?
Baumrucker SJ
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17347510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical ethics in the context of language and cognitive impairment: rights and protections.
Brady Wagner LC
Semin Speech Lang; 2003 Nov; 24(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 14722801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A critique of family members as proxy decisionmakers without legal limits.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(2):133-65. PubMed ID: 8936849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Not for all terminally ill patients.
Ginn D; Zitner D
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Apr; 41():649-52, 655-7. PubMed ID: 7787495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Personhood, patienthood, and clinical practice: reassessing advance directives.
Rich BA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):610-28. PubMed ID: 12803209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. When any answer is a good answer: a mandated-choice model for advance directives.
Appel J
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 20507692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Prospective autonomy: on the limits of shaping one's postcompetence medical fate.
Cantor NL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():13-48. PubMed ID: 10118983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The Patient Self-Determination Act: potential ethical quandaries and benefits.
Young EW; Jex SA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 1342338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The Patient Self-Determination Act: sources of concern for nurses.
Mezey M; Evans LK; Golub ZD; Murphy E; White GB
Nurs Outlook; 1994; 42(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 8202395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Advance directives in oncology: are they useful?
Grennan T
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2004 Jul; 116(13):431-3. PubMed ID: 15344342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. When to use advance treatment directives.
Pankratz HR
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1421. PubMed ID: 1423077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [New italian law about end of life: self-determination and shared care pathway.].
Ciliberti R; Gulino M; Gorini I
Recenti Prog Med; 2018 May; 109(5):267-271. PubMed ID: 29771249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Nurses have an important role in consent issues.
Parker S
Br J Nurs; 1999 Sep 9-22; 8(16):1048. PubMed ID: 10711039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
