130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728924)
1. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Lessons from Nancy Cruzan.
Fairman RP
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 1728924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lessons from Cruzan.
Meisel A
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan: no rights violated.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
Veatch RM
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cruzan decision and medical practice.
Thomasma DC
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2312269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choosing death for Nancy Cruzan.
Bopp J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 2107153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective.
Drane JF
Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
