These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728924)
41. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill. Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition. Burke WJ; Pullicino P; Coverdale JF Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391-2; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17265563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition. Cochrane T; Truog RD Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17261691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition. Bernat JL; Beresford HR Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1618-9. PubMed ID: 16769929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct. Gostin L; Weir RF Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws. Larriviere D; Bonnie RJ Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1624-8. PubMed ID: 16571840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Is the continued provision of food and fluids in Nancy Cruzan's best interests? Harris CE; Bostrom BA Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):415-35. PubMed ID: 2108099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The views of the judiciary regarding life-sustaining medical treatment decisions. Hafemeister TL; Robinson DM Law Psychol Rev; 1994; 18():189-246. PubMed ID: 16523577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Position of the American Dietetic Association: legal and ethical issues in feeding permanently unconscious patients. J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Feb; 95(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 7852693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The withdrawal or refusal of food and hydration as age discrimination: some possibilities. Uddo BJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 2427474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment. Fletcher JC Va Med; 1989 Nov; 116(11):462-5. PubMed ID: 2815990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. After Cruzan: the "values base" to advance directives. Keyser PK Orthop Nurs; 1992; 11(5):37-40. PubMed ID: 1408374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Prisoners of technology--the case of Nancy Cruzan. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1226-8. PubMed ID: 2325714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]