BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728997)

  • 1. Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):120-3. PubMed ID: 1728997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.
    Huiskes R; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):124-34. PubMed ID: 1728998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
    D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.
    Maloney WJ; Sychterz C; Bragdon C; McGovern T; Jasty M; Engh CA; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):15-26. PubMed ID: 8981879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.