These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728998)

  • 1. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.
    Huiskes R; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):124-34. PubMed ID: 1728998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement.
    Huiskes R; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):64-76. PubMed ID: 7554651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss.
    van Lenthe GH; Willems MM; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt MC; Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 12553509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies.
    Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():118-29. PubMed ID: 8116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.
    Van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R; Weinans H; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Galante JO
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):369-82. PubMed ID: 8478342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization.
    Boyle C; Kim IY
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1722-8. PubMed ID: 21497816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodeling around total hip implants.
    Smolinski P; Rubash HE
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(5-6):461-83. PubMed ID: 1486786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):120-3. PubMed ID: 1728997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Bobyn JD; Mortimer ES; Glassman AH; Engh CA; Miller JE; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):79-96. PubMed ID: 1729025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of 2 proximally coated femoral stems: effects of stem length and surface finish.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Manley MT; Kurtz SM; Geesink R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18977636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface.
    Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):202-12. PubMed ID: 1729005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.
    Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.