BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728998)

  • 1. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.
    Huiskes R; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):124-34. PubMed ID: 1728998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement.
    Huiskes R; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):64-76. PubMed ID: 7554651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss.
    van Lenthe GH; Willems MM; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt MC; Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 12553509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies.
    Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():118-29. PubMed ID: 8116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.
    Van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R; Weinans H; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Galante JO
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):369-82. PubMed ID: 8478342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization.
    Boyle C; Kim IY
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1722-8. PubMed ID: 21497816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodeling around total hip implants.
    Smolinski P; Rubash HE
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(5-6):461-83. PubMed ID: 1486786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):120-3. PubMed ID: 1728997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Bobyn JD; Mortimer ES; Glassman AH; Engh CA; Miller JE; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):79-96. PubMed ID: 1729025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of 2 proximally coated femoral stems: effects of stem length and surface finish.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Manley MT; Kurtz SM; Geesink R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18977636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface.
    Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):202-12. PubMed ID: 1729005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.
    Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.