These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1728998)

  • 21. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of femoral stem geometry, material and extent of porous coating on bone ingrowth and atrophy in cementless total hip arthroplasty: an iterative finite element model.
    Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Jacobs CR; Pellegrini VD
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Apr; 12(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 19242833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Bone remodeling numerical simulation on the basis of bone adaptive theory].
    Chen B; Zhao W; Sun Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 18610623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement.
    Kuiper JH; Huiskes R
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Jan; 14(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 8618164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calculated stress-shielding in the distal femur after total knee replacement corresponds to the reported location of bone loss.
    Tissakht M; Ahmed AM; Chan KC
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):778-85. PubMed ID: 8893772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus.
    Li J; Li H; Shi L; Fok AS; Ucer C; Devlin H; Horner K; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17137621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Symposium on Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Hip. Biomechanics: mutifactorial design choices--an essential compromise?
    Clarke IC
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1982 Oct; 13(4):681-707. PubMed ID: 7145341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 18036530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
    Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peri-implant bone remodeling after total hip replacement combined with systemic alendronate treatment: a finite element analysis.
    Peter B; Ramaniraka N; Rakotomanana LR; Zambelli PY; Pioletti DP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Apr; 7(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 15203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Prediction of femoral remodeling after implantation of artifical femoral head].
    Gao Z; Zhao C; Yu Q; Wu D; Yu J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 20(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 12856602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.