These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1729025)
21. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. Kärrholm J; Anderberg C; Snorrason F; Thanner J; Langeland N; Malchau H; Herberts P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Sep; 84(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 12208924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone loss from the proximal femur after arthroplasty with an isoelastic femoral stem. BMD measurements in 25 patients after 9 years. Niinimäki T; Jalovaara P Acta Orthop Scand; 1995 Aug; 66(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 7676824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Sumner DR; Galante JO Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):202-12. PubMed ID: 1729005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. Turner TM; Sumner DR; Urban RM; Rivero DP; Galante JO J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Dec; 68(9):1396-409. PubMed ID: 3782212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Altered load history affects periprosthetic bone loss following cementless total hip arthroplasty. Bryan JM; Sumner DR; Hurwitz DE; Tompkins GS; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8893770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiological changes around the stem after cementless hip implantation in case of the anatomic medullary locking hip system -- five years results. Roth A; Winzer T; Babisch J; Fuhrmann R; Sander K; Venbrocks R Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15860152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. Scott DF; Jaffe WL J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 8792250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration]. Roth A; Richartz G; Sander K; Sachse A; Fuhrmann R; Wagner A; Venbrocks RA Orthopade; 2005 Apr; 34(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 15726320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New femoral designs: do they influence stress shielding? Glassman AH; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():64-74. PubMed ID: 17312586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Zerahn B; Storgaard M; Johansen T; Olsen C; Lausten G; Kanstrup IL Int Orthop; 1998; 22(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9795808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization. Boyle C; Kim IY J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1722-8. PubMed ID: 21497816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis. Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone remodeling in experimental total hip arthroplasty. Sumner DR; Galante JO Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 1297575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Densitometric evaluation of the proximal femur after cemented hip prosthesis]. Mazurkiewicz H; Gusta A; Kwas A Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1995; 60(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 8565682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis. Engh CA; Massin P Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):141-58. PubMed ID: 2582665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In-vitro biomechanical evaluation of stress shielding and initial stability of a low-modulus hip stem made of β type Ti-33.6Nb-4Sn alloy. Yamako G; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Hanada S; Masahashi N; Yamada N; Itoi E Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1665-71. PubMed ID: 25282098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement. Wan Z; Dorr LD; Woodsome T; Ranawat A; Song M J Arthroplasty; 1999 Feb; 14(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 10065719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. Huiskes R; van Rietbergen B Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):64-76. PubMed ID: 7554651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]