238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17291142)
1. Automated CTA quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: a pilot trial.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Kanitsar A; Rand T; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Feb; 14(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 17291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion?
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Aug; 13(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing internal carotid artery stenosis with a semiautomated computed tomography angiography tool and duplex ultrasound.
Müller M; Agten CA; Österreich M; Hoffmann M
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 61(6):1449-56. PubMed ID: 25776187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quantification of extracranial ICA stenoses with vessel ultrasound by CCDS and B-flow in comparison to 64-slice multidector CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA].
Finkenzeller T; Tacke J; Clevert DA; Jung W; Kubale R; Schreyer A; Feuerbach S; Jung EM
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Jun; 29(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 18484060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidetector CTA in the quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: value of different reformation techniques and axial source images compared with selective carotid arteriography.
Puchner S; Popovic M; Wolf F; Reiter M; Lammer J; Bucek RA
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Jun; 16(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19642783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CTA quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: application of luminal area vs. luminal diameter measurements and assessment of inter-observer variability.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Reiter M; Minar E; Lammer J
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Jul; 17(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 17608907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria and multidetector computed tomographic angiography.
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Sabeti S; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Apr; 13(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 16643072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography.
McKinney AM; Casey SO; Teksam M; Lucato LT; Smith M; Truwit CL; Kieffer S
Neuroradiology; 2005 Jan; 47(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15650832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic shadowing impairs accurate characterization of stenosis in carotid ultrasound examinations.
Mohebali J; Patel VI; Romero JM; Hannon KM; Jaff MR; Cambria RP; LaMuraglia GM
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Nov; 62(5):1236-44. PubMed ID: 26506272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Measurement and Grading of Carotid Stenosis with Computed Tomography Angiography and Doppler Ultrasound.
Birmpili P; Porter L; Shaikh U; Torella F
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():217-224. PubMed ID: 29522870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with three-dimensional CT angiography and surgical revascularization].
Ohtaki M; Tanabe S; Uede T; Hashi K
No Shinkei Geka; 1996 Nov; 24(11):995-1002. PubMed ID: 8934467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses.
Herzig R; Burval S; Krupka B; Vlachová I; Urbánek K; Mares J
Eur J Neurol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):774-81. PubMed ID: 15525300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of semi-automated measurement of carotid stenosis on CTA.
White JH; Bartlett ES; Bharatha A; Aviv RI; Fox AJ; Thompson AL; Bitar R; Symons SP
Can J Neurol Sci; 2010 Jul; 37(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 20724259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading of carotid artery stenosis with multidetector-row CT angiography: visual estimation or caliper measurements?
Waaijer A; Weber M; van Leeuwen MS; Kardux J; Veldhuis WB; Lo R; Beek FJ; Prokop M
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2809-18. PubMed ID: 19618190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
