BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17292802)

  • 1. Gamma oscillatory activity in a visual discrimination task.
    Freunberger R; Klimesch W; Sauseng P; Griesmayr B; Höller Y; Pecherstorfer T; Hanslmayr S
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Mar; 71(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 17292802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Object recognition learning differentiates the representations of objects at the ERP component N1.
    Wang G; Suemitsu K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 17141565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induced gamma-band activity is related to the time point of object identification.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Hantsch A; Müller MM
    Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 1198():93-106. PubMed ID: 18243166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention.
    Siegel M; Donner TH; Oostenveld R; Fries P; Engel AK
    Neuron; 2008 Nov; 60(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 19038226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical oscillatory power changes during auditory oddball task revealed by spatially filtered magnetoencephalography.
    Ishii R; Canuet L; Herdman A; Gunji A; Iwase M; Takahashi H; Nakahachi T; Hirata M; Robinson SE; Pantev C; Takeda M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 19138878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuronal correlates of repetition priming of frequently presented objects: insights from induced gamma band responses.
    Conrad N; Giabbiconi CM; Müller MM; Gruber T
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Dec; 429(2-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 17976911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):921-34. PubMed ID: 17536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct contrasts between experimental conditions may yield more focal oscillatory activations than comparing pre- versus post-stimulus responses.
    Kaiser J; Rahm B; Lutzenberger W
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1235():63-73. PubMed ID: 18602906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body.
    Thierry G; Pegna AJ; Dodds C; Roberts M; Basan S; Downing P
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):871-9. PubMed ID: 16750639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-related temporal and topographical changes of cortical activity during ultra-rapid visual categorization.
    Kincses TZ; Chadaide Z; Varga ET; Antal A; Paulus W
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1112(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 16928365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactile stimulation accelerates behavioral responses to visual stimuli through enhancement of occipital gamma-band activity.
    Bauer M; Oostenveld R; Fries P
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):931-42. PubMed ID: 19324067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hippocampus proper distinguishes between identified and unidentified real-life visual objects: an intracranial ERP study.
    Vannucci M; Grunwald T; Pezer N; Dietl T; Helmstaedter C; Schaller C; Viggiano MP; Elger CE
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jun; 401(1-2):165-70. PubMed ID: 16567041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain electrical tomography (BET) analysis of induced gamma band responses during a simple object recognition task.
    Gruber T; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Giabbiconi CM; Valdés-Sosa PA; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):888-900. PubMed ID: 16242965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of synchronized induced Gamma-Band responses during a simple object recognition task: a replication study in human MEG.
    Gruber T; Maess B; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Müller MM
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():74-84. PubMed ID: 18234156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500ms.
    Schendan HE; Lucia LC
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():124-41. PubMed ID: 20122902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillatory gamma and theta activity during repeated mental manipulations of a visual image.
    Kawasaki M; Watanabe M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jul; 422(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 17602835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual visual grouping under inattention: electrophysiological functional imaging.
    Razpurker-Apfeld I; Pratt H
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 18316148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating models of object-decision priming: evidence from event-related potential repetition effects.
    Soldan A; Mangels JA; Cooper LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):230-48. PubMed ID: 16569143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic memory retrieval: cortical couplings in object recognition in the N400 window.
    Supp GG; Schlögl A; Fiebach CJ; Gunter TC; Vigliocco G; Pfurtscheller G; Petsche H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1139-43. PubMed ID: 15787719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.