These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17292898)

  • 1. Economics of flexible vs. rigid catheters for intrauterine insemination.
    Proctor JG; Boone WR
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):749-50. PubMed ID: 17292898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flexible versus rigid intrauterine insemination catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Miller PB; Acres ML; Proctor JG; Higdon HL; Boone WR
    Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1544-6. PubMed ID: 15866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Catheter type does not affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: a prospective randomized study.
    Fancsovits P; Toth L; Murber A; Szendei G; Papp Z; Urbancsek J
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):699-704. PubMed ID: 15749500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus human FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles: a statistical model-derived analysis.
    Gerli S; Bini V; Di Renzo GC
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2008 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18224540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination.
    Esmailzadeh S; Faramarzi M
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):432-7. PubMed ID: 17434500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation for treatment of infertility: an audit of a new IUI programme in a low resource setting.
    Ikechebelu JI; Okeke CA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jan; 27(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 17365462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fertility treatments: possibilities for fewer multiple births and lower costs--the 'Umbrella' study].
    Merkus JM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 May; 150(21):1162-4. PubMed ID: 16768277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine insemination.
    ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
    Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 19240042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External validation of a prediction model for an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.
    Custers IM; Steures P; van der Steeg JW; van Dessel TJ; Bernardus RE; Bourdrez P; Koks CA; Riedijk WJ; Burggraaff JM; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):425-31. PubMed ID: 17408625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prevalence and influence of luteinizing hormone surges in stimulated cycles combined with intrauterine insemination during a prospective cohort study.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jul; 88(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 17445811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double vs. single intrauterine insemination per cycle: use in gonadotropin cycles and in diagnostic categories of ovulatory dysfunction and male factor infertility.
    Randall GW; Gantt PA
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Mar; 53(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 18441725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Guven S; Gunalp GS; Tekin Y
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Apr; 53(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18472648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified hysterosalpingography catheter for embryo transfer and intrauterine insemination.
    Pazdziorko S; Tulchinsky D
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 May; 10(4):308-10. PubMed ID: 8130439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.
    Gregoriou O; Vlahos NF; Konidaris S; Papadias K; Botsis D; Creatsas GK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 17961561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study.
    Erdem A; Erdem M; Atmaca S; Guler I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2508-13. PubMed ID: 18692788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination: analysis of more than 4100 cycles.
    Dovey S; Sneeringer RM; Penzias AS
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2281-6. PubMed ID: 18191842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of daily and alternate day recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination.
    Kabli N; Sylvestre C; Tulandi T; Buckett W
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1141-4. PubMed ID: 18342857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound-guided artificial insemination: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ramón O; Matorras R; Corcóstegui B; Meabe A; Burgos J; Expósito A; Crisol L
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1080-4. PubMed ID: 19196748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Location of semen collection and time interval from collection to use for intrauterine insemination.
    Song GJ; Herko R; Lewis V
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1689-91. PubMed ID: 17368454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of rescue in vitro fertilization converted from high-response gonadotropin intrauterine insemination cycles in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates as compared with matched controls.
    Haydardedeoglu B; Bagis T; Simsek E; Cok T; Hacivelioglu SO; Erkanli S
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18692785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.