156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17293252)
1. [Prevention of shoulder dystocia by an ultrasound selection at the beginning of labour of foetuses with large abdominal circumference].
Maticot-Baptista D; Collin A; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Feb; 36(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17293252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia.
Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more.
Jazayeri A; Heffron JA; Phillips R; Spellacy WN
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 10214826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation.
Al-Inany H; Alaa N; Momtaz M; Abdel Badii M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2001; 51(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11223705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of fetal anthropometric measures to predict the risk for shoulder dystocia.
Burkhardt T; Schmidt M; Kurmanavicius J; Zimmermann R; Schäffer L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23836579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?
Gonen R; Spiegel D; Abend M
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):526-9. PubMed ID: 8841211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antenatal macrosomia prediction using sonographic fetal abdominal circumference in South Tunisia.
Chaabane K; Trigui K; Louati D; Kebaili S; Gassara H; Dammak A; Amouri H; Guermazi M
Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 14():111. PubMed ID: 23717725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of increased fetal asymmetry with shoulder dystocia in the nondiabetic woman with suspected macrosomia.
Rajan PV; Chung JH; Porto M; Wing DA
J Reprod Med; 2009 Aug; 54(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 19769192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of labour and perinatal complications in case of foetus weight over 4000 g].
Piasek G; Starzewski J; Chil A; Wrona-Cyranowska A; Gutowski J; Anisiewicz A; Pejas-Dembowska R; Malmur M; Krawczyk J; Rudziński R
Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(5-6):326-31. PubMed ID: 17017476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Relationship between fetal abdominal circumference and birth weight: clinical findings in 1475 pregnancies].
Shi CY; Zhang XX; Jin YZ; Dong Y; Zhang YY; Lin L; Li XJ; Zhang BR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):732-4. PubMed ID: 16324244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000 g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran.
Dadkhah F; Kashanian M; Bonyad Z; Larijani T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22690747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic Examination of The Fetus Vis-à-Vis Shoulder Dystocia: A Vexing Promise.
Doty MS; Al-Hafez L; Chauhan SP
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 59(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 27681691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macrosomia.
Araujo Júnior E; Peixoto AB; Zamarian AC; Elito Júnior J; Tonni G
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 38():83-96. PubMed ID: 27727018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia.
Sacks DA; Chen W
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2000 Apr; 55(4):229-39. PubMed ID: 10758619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The test accuracy of antenatal ultrasound definitions of fetal macrosomia to predict birth injury: A systematic review.
Robinson R; Walker KF; White VA; Bugg GJ; Snell KIE; Jones NW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():79-85. PubMed ID: 31978846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone.
Henrichs C; Magann EF; Brantley KL; Crews JH; Sanderson M; Chauhan SP
J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 12815906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
