These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17294177)

  • 1. Exploring number space by random digit generation.
    Loetscher T; Brugger P
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):655-65. PubMed ID: 17294177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic, perceptual and number space: relations between category width and spatial processing.
    Brugger P; Loetscher T; Graves RE; Knoch D
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 418(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 17400383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?
    Dolores de Hevia M; Girelli L; Vallar G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):254-64. PubMed ID: 16044296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deaf Individuals Show a Leftward Bias in Numerical Bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26562852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered mental number line in amblyopia--reduced pseudoneglect corresponds to a decreased bias in number estimation.
    Mohr HM; Mues HT; Robol V; Sireteanu R
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1775-81. PubMed ID: 20226200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Orr CA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection.
    Thomas NA; Rose W; Nicholls ME
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 26529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Silvanto J; Tinti C; Vecchi T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 21287314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listening to numbers affects visual and haptic bisection in healthy individuals and neglect patients.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Mancini F; Mattioli F; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):913-25. PubMed ID: 22326591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical ordered sequences: insights from a random generation task.
    Di Bono MG; Zorzi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23574588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.