These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17294384)

  • 1. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold.
    Midena E; Radin PP; Convento E; Cavarzeran F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17294384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES.
    Parodi MB; Triolo G; Morales M; Borrelli E; Cicinelli MV; Cascavilla ML; Bandello F
    Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1662-9. PubMed ID: 26214316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
    Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
    Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Schumacher N; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9683149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.
    Acton JH; Greenstein VC
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 24093180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving detection of mild loss of retinal light increment sensitivity at the posterior pole with the microperimeter MP1.
    Bowl W; Lorenz B; Jäger M; Friedburg C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4666-74. PubMed ID: 23716630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1.
    Midena E; Vujosevic S; Cavarzeran F;
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1571-6, 1576.e1. PubMed ID: 20472294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normative data for macular perimetry using the MP-3 microperimeter in healthy individuals.
    Rodrigues Neto TDS; Silva Neto EDD; Higashi AH; Megnis BP; Haddad MAO; Monteiro MLR; Zacharias LC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023; 87(5):e20210472. PubMed ID: 39298722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.
    Rohrschneider K; Fendrich T; Becker M; Krastel H; Kruse FE; Völcker HE
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Dec; 233(12):743-9. PubMed ID: 8626081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Static fundus perimetry in normals. Microperimeter 1 versus SLO].
    Springer C; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Mar; 103(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16091926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Macular sensitivity change in multiple sclerosis followed with microperimetry.
    Romano MR; Angi M; Romano F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 17534832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope fundus perimetry before and after laser photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular edema.
    Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Glück R; Kruse FE; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 129(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10653409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of retinal sensitivity measured with fundus-related microperimetry to visual acuity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
    Okada K; Yamamoto S; Mizunoya S; Hoshino A; Arai M; Takatsuna Y
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):805-9. PubMed ID: 16021181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between Octopus perimetry and fluorescein angiography after strontium-90 plaque brachytherapy for subfoveal exudative age related macular degeneration.
    Jaakkola A; Vesti E; Immonen I
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 82(7):763-8. PubMed ID: 9924368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-Retest Reliability of Scotopic and Mesopic Fundus-Controlled Perimetry Using a Modified MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment) in Normal Eyes.
    Pfau M; Lindner M; Fleckenstein M; Finger RP; Rubin GS; Harmening WM; Morales MU; Holz FG; Schmitz-Valckenberg S
    Ophthalmologica; 2017; 237(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27997924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
    Shah VA; Chalam KV
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of decreased retinal illumination on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 108(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 2596543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of stimulus size on the measured threshold values in automated perimetry.
    Choplin NT; Sherwood MB; Spaeth GL
    Ophthalmology; 1990 Mar; 97(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 2336276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.
    Bowl W; Stieger K; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 253(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 25904295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.