129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1729488)
21. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Euthanasia and the healthcare professional.
Nnadi-Okolo EE
Hosp Pharm; 1995 Mar; 30(3):208-10, 213, 220. PubMed ID: 10140765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Supreme Court of India on euthanasia: Too little, too late.
Bandewar SV; Chaudhuri L; Duggal L; Nagral S
Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):91-94. PubMed ID: 29724694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pettis v. Smith and Braddock. In the Louisiana Court of Appeal.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2005; 20(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 15916260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nancy Cruzan is allowed to die, but uncertainties remain.
Fry ST
Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(2):96. PubMed ID: 1997971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Euthanasia, the ultimate abandonment.
Marker RL
Ethics Med; 1990; 6(2):21-5. PubMed ID: 16001473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Withdrawal of life-sustaining means].
Rosario Burgos E
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1994; 86(10-12):72-3. PubMed ID: 7857480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The living will: does an advance refusal of treatment made with capacity always survive any supervening incapacity?
Bernat E
Med Law Int; 1999; 4(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15072072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The right to die.
Wootton B
New Soc; 1978 Oct; 46(838):202-3. PubMed ID: 11661929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The faulty promise of living wills.
Carey J
US News World Rep; 1989 Jul; 107(4):63-4. PubMed ID: 11653855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hard cases and the politics of righteousness.
Schneider CE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 16092397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.
Caralis PV
J Fla Med Assoc; 1990 Sep; 77(9):821-8. PubMed ID: 2121893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Withholding and withdrawing nutritional support: advance planning for hard choices.
Mishkin B
Nutr Clin Pract; 1986; 1(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 11649781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Videotaping living wills: dying declarations brought to life.
Buckley WR
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 22(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 11650089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Towards the right to be killed? Treatment refusal, assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States and Canada.
Lemmens T
Br Med Bull; 1996 Apr; 52(2):341-53. PubMed ID: 8759232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The empirical slippery slope from voluntary to non-voluntary euthanasia.
Lewis P
J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17341228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal and ethical considerations of "living will".
Huilgol N
Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 15125415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Living wills aside, dying cling to hope.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():C10. PubMed ID: 11647197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal.
Mooney CA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
