These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17295313)

  • 1. A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images.
    Bischoff-Grethe A; Ozyurt IB; Busa E; Quinn BT; Fennema-Notestine C; Clark CP; Morris S; Bondi MW; Jernigan TL; Dale AM; Brown GG; Fischl B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Sep; 28(9):892-903. PubMed ID: 17295313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of automated skull-stripping methods applied to contemporary and legacy images: effects of diagnosis, bias correction, and slice location.
    Fennema-Notestine C; Ozyurt IB; Clark CP; Morris S; Bischoff-Grethe A; Bondi MW; Jernigan TL; Fischl B; Segonne F; Shattuck DW; Leahy RM; Rex DE; Toga AW; Zou KH; Brown GG
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Feb; 27(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 15986433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods.
    Shattuck DW; Prasad G; Mirza M; Narr KL; Toga AW
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 19073267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The preprocessed connectomes project repository of manually corrected skull-stripped T1-weighted anatomical MRI data.
    Puccio B; Pooley JP; Pellman JS; Taverna EC; Craddock RC
    Gigascience; 2016 Oct; 5(1):45. PubMed ID: 27782853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set.
    Zhuang AH; Valentino DJ; Toga AW
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16697666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology.
    Roy S; Butman JA; Pham DL;
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():132-147. PubMed ID: 27864083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic evaluation of the impact of defacing on quality and volumetric assessments on T1-weighted MR-images.
    Bhalerao GV; Parekh P; Saini J; Venkatasubramanian G; John JP;
    J Neuroradiol; 2022 May; 49(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 33727023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images.
    Park JG; Lee C
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1394-407. PubMed ID: 19389477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI.
    Ségonne F; Dale AM; Busa E; Glessner M; Salat D; Hahn HK; Fischl B
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1060-75. PubMed ID: 15219578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of skull-stripping and radio-frequency bias correction on grey-matter segmentation for voxel-based morphometry.
    Acosta-Cabronero J; Williams GB; Pereira JM; Pengas G; Nestor PJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1654-65. PubMed ID: 18065243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skull-stripping with machine learning deformable organisms.
    Prasad G; Joshi AA; Feng A; Toga AW; Thompson PM; Terzopoulos D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Oct; 236():114-24. PubMed ID: 25124851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.
    Galdames FJ; Jaillet F; Perez CA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012; 206(2):103-19. PubMed ID: 22387261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skull stripping using graph cuts.
    Sadananthan SA; Zheng W; Chee MW; Zagorodnov V
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):225-39. PubMed ID: 19732839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods.
    de Sitter A; Visser M; Brouwer I; Cover KS; van Schijndel RA; Eijgelaar RS; Müller DMJ; Ropele S; Kappos L; Rovira Á; Filippi M; Enzinger C; Frederiksen J; Ciccarelli O; Guttmann CRG; Wattjes MP; Witte MG; de Witt Hamer PC; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1062-1074. PubMed ID: 31691120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic segmentation of brain MR images using an adaptive balloon snake model with fuzzy classification.
    Liu HT; Sheu TW; Chang HH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1091-104. PubMed ID: 23744446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.
    Iglesias JE; Liu CY; Thompson PM; Tu Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1617-34. PubMed ID: 21880566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis and validation of automated skull stripping tools: a validation study based on 296 MR images from the Honolulu Asia aging study.
    Hartley SW; Scher AI; Korf ES; White LR; Launer LJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1179-86. PubMed ID: 16376107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic method to assess local CT-MR imaging registration accuracy on images of the head.
    Pappas IP; Styner M; Malik P; Remonda L; Caversaccio M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 15661715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic detection of intradural spaces in MR images.
    Ardekani BA; Braun M; Kanno I; Hutton BF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):963-9. PubMed ID: 7962809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3-D human MRI using mathematical morphology.
    Dogdas B; Shattuck DW; Leahy RM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15966000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.