These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17296049)

  • 1. [Evaluation of consequences of test use in validity theory].
    Padilla JL; Gómez J; Hildago MD; Muñiz J
    Psicothema; 2006 May; 18(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 17296049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach.
    Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i19-32. PubMed ID: 16880221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining and distinguishing validity: interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use.
    Cizek GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 22268761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure.
    Gómez-Benito J; Sireci S; Padilla JL; Hidalgo MD; Benítez I
    Psicothema; 2018 Feb; 30(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 29363478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: a quantitative perspective.
    Helms JE
    Am Psychol; 2006 Nov; 61(8):845-859. PubMed ID: 17115831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating assessments: Introduction to the Special Section.
    Sireci S; Padilla JL
    Psicothema; 2014; 26(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 24444736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity evidence based on internal structure.
    Rios J; Wells C
    Psicothema; 2014; 26(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24444738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: improving psychological assessment in science and practice.
    Bornstein RF
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Jun; 23(2):532-44. PubMed ID: 21668126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fair use of tests in health sciences].
    Espelt A; Viladrich C; Doval E; Aliaga J; García-Rueda R; Tárrega S
    Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 24928357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines based on validity criteria for the development of multiple choice items.
    Moreno R; Martínez RJ; Muñiz J
    Psicothema; 2015; 27(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 26493578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity evidence based on response processes.
    Padilla JL; Benítez I
    Psicothema; 2014; 26(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 24444741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best practices for examining and reporting the social consequences of educational measures.
    Herman KC; Bonifay W
    Sch Psychol; 2023 May; 38(3):129-136. PubMed ID: 37184956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Part of) the case for a pragmatic approach to validity: comment on De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, and Moors (2009).
    Nosek BA; Greenwald AG
    Psychol Bull; 2009 May; 135(3):373-376. PubMed ID: 19379020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective citation mars conclusions about test validity and predictive bias.
    Kuncel NR; Sackett PR
    Am Psychol; 2007; 62(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 17324044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validity: a forgotten issue?
    Palla S; Farella M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 20812434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validation scheme and procedures to analyze consequential validity].
    Padilla JL; Gómez J; Hidalgo MD; Muñiz J
    Psicothema; 2007 Feb; 19(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 17296001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The lower-limb tasks questionnaire: an assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal important differences.
    McNair PJ; Prapavessis H; Collier J; Bassett S; Bryant A; Larmer P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):993-1001. PubMed ID: 17678661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability.
    Kadir MM; Qureshi AF
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1994 Jun; 44(6):155-7. PubMed ID: 8089912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.