1810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17296378)
1. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.
Webster TM; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Baumgartner RG; Anderson LW; Smith JA
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):912-4; discussion 914. PubMed ID: 16093986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of early adopter bias for new technologies in robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Tseng TY; Cancel QV; Fesperman SF; Kuebler HR; Sun L; Robertson CN; Polascik TJ; Moul JW; Vieweg J; Albala DM; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1318-23. PubMed ID: 17382723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted total prostatectomies: comparison of postoperative course and histological and functional results based on a series of 86 prostatectomies].
Durand X; Vaessen C; Bitker MO; Richard F
Prog Urol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 18342158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
D'Alonzo RC; Gan TJ; Moul JW; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sun L; Dahm P; Habib AS
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Aug; 21(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 19700296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; Bañez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience.
Finley DS; Rodriguez E; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1296-9; discussion 1299-300. PubMed ID: 17698133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reality or dream?].
Fornara P; Zacharias M
Aktuelle Urol; 2004 Sep; 35(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 15368129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.
Miller J; Smith A; Kouba E; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
Parsons JK; Bennett JL
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 18267330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
