274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17296560)
1. Search goal tunes visual features optimally.
Navalpakkam V; Itti L
Neuron; 2007 Feb; 53(4):605-17. PubMed ID: 17296560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model of active visual search with object-based attention guiding scan paths.
Lanyon LJ; Denham SL
Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):873-97. PubMed ID: 15288904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature-based attention and the suppression of non-relevant object features.
Wegener D; Ehn F; Aurich MK; Galashan FO; Kreiter AK
Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(27):2696-707. PubMed ID: 18824190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
Schubö A; Müller HJ
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual psychophysics: synchrony in motion.
Gegenfurtner K
Nat Neurosci; 1998 Jun; 1(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 10195121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Texture-surround suppression of contour-shape coding in human vision.
Kingdom FA; Prins N
Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 18852682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets.
Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2346-51. PubMed ID: 15913702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A neural network implementation of a saliency map model.
de Brecht M; Saiki J
Neural Netw; 2006 Dec; 19(10):1467-74. PubMed ID: 16687235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
Lamy D; Zoaris L
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive coding as a model of the V1 saliency map hypothesis.
Spratling MW
Neural Netw; 2012 Feb; 26():7-28. PubMed ID: 22047778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
Chen Z
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Covert visual search: prior beliefs are optimally combined with sensory evidence.
Vincent B
J Vis; 2011 Nov; 11(13):25. PubMed ID: 22131446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hue geometry and horizontal connections.
Ben-Shahar O; Zucker SW
Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):753-71. PubMed ID: 15288896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search.
Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coevolution of active vision and feature selection.
Floreano D; Kato T; Marocco D; Sauser E
Biol Cybern; 2004 Mar; 90(3):218-28. PubMed ID: 15052484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
