These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17297127)

  • 1. Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle.
    Bryant JR; López-Villalobos N; Pryce JE; Holmes CW; Johnson DL; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 17297127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short communication: Effect of environment on the expression of breed and heterosis effects for production traits.
    Bryant JR; López-Villalobos N; Pryce JE; Holmes CW; Johnson DL; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1548-53. PubMed ID: 17297128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3756-64. PubMed ID: 14672207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records.
    Hayes BJ; Carrick M; Bowman P; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3736-44. PubMed ID: 14672205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle.
    Cole JB; Null DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2248-58. PubMed ID: 19389984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.
    Fahey AG; Schutz MM; Lofgren DL; Schinckel AP; Stewart TS
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3889-99. PubMed ID: 17639000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene by environment interactions for production traits in Australian dairy cattle.
    Lillehammer M; Hayes BJ; Meuwissen TH; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4008-17. PubMed ID: 19620684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries.
    Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Fikse WF; Rekaya R
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Mar; 86(3):1009-18. PubMed ID: 12703638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.
    Raffrenato E; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Carvalheira J; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jul; 86(7):2470-9. PubMed ID: 12906065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype by environment interaction for fertility, survival, and milk production traits in Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Carrick MJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4840-53. PubMed ID: 19038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records.
    Weigel KA; Rekaya R; Zwald NR; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2789-95. PubMed ID: 11814036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short communication: Interactions of milk, fat, and protein yield genotypes with herd feeding characteristics.
    Dekleva MW; Dechow CD; Daubert JM; Liu WS; Varga GA; Bauck S; Woodward BW
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1559-64. PubMed ID: 22365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of informative cooperator herds for progeny testing based on yield deviations.
    Schierenbeck S; Reinhardt F; Reents R; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2071-82. PubMed ID: 21426998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of milk production traits in early lactation using a reaction norm model with unknown covariates.
    Shariati MM; Su G; Madsen P; Sorensen D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5759-66. PubMed ID: 18024770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic parameters for milk urea nitrogen in relation to milk production traits.
    Stoop WM; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1981-6. PubMed ID: 17369239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
    Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.