These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17297780)

  • 1. Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces.
    Kobayashi M; Morimoto M; Sato H; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 17297780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces.
    Morimoto M; Sato H; Kobayashi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1607-13. PubMed ID: 15478426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective Listening Effort and Electrodermal Activity in Listening Situations with Reverberation and Noise.
    Holube I; Haeder K; Imbery C; Weber R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of aging on word intelligibility and listening difficulty in various reverberant fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2915-22. PubMed ID: 17550189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels.
    Recker KL; Micheyl C
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Sato H; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2087-93. PubMed ID: 18397016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures for assessing architectural speech security (privacy) of closed offices and meeting rooms.
    Gover BN; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3480-90. PubMed ID: 15658699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of noise and filtering on the intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 15450438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-in-noise enhancement using amplification and dynamic range compression controlled by the speech intelligibility index.
    Schepker H; Rennies J; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2692-706. PubMed ID: 26627746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.