These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17300824)

  • 21. Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces.
    Yi DJ; Kelley TA; Marois R; Chun MM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16507300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.
    Armann R; Bülthoff I
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():69-80. PubMed ID: 22595743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring children's face-space: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mental representation of facial identity.
    Nishimura M; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):355-75. PubMed ID: 19342062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles.
    Vuong QC; Peissig JJ; Harrison MC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1213-23. PubMed ID: 15733955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.
    Rossion B; Caharel S
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The application of 3D representations in face recognition.
    Schwaninger A; Yang J
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(9):969-77. PubMed ID: 21324334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context.
    Dolan RJ; Fink GR; Rolls E; Booth M; Holmes A; Frackowiak RS; Friston KJ
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6651):596-9. PubMed ID: 9335498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. My left brain and me: a dissociation in the perception of self and others.
    Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1156-61. PubMed ID: 15178167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.
    Gauthier I; Curran T; Curby KM; Collins D
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces in Parkinson's disease: behavioral and electrophysiologic measures.
    Kida Y; Tachibana H; Takeda M; Yoshikawa H; Okita T
    Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2007 Apr; 13(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17129744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H; Stahl J; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Face inversion superiority in a case of prosopagnosia following congenital brain abnormalities: what can it tell us about the specificity and origin of face-processing mechanisms?
    Schmalzl L; Palermo R; Harris IM; Coltheart M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 26(3):286-306. PubMed ID: 19657795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face-selective regions other than the fusiform face area.
    Ramon M; Dricot L; Rossion B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1587-98. PubMed ID: 20880360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: an ERP investigation of newly learned faces.
    Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1356():54-72. PubMed ID: 20673756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.