193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17300929)
1. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correcting population-based survival for DCOs - why a simple method works and when to avoid it.
Silcocks P; Thomson CS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3298-302. PubMed ID: 19656670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deriving valid population-based cancer survival estimates in the presence of nonnegligible proportions of cancers notified by death certificates only.
Brenner H; Holleczek B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Dec; 20(12):2480-6. PubMed ID: 21960691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation, precision and validity of 1-year survival estimates for lung, breast, colon and prostate cancer in South East England primary care trusts.
Lake J; Mak V; Møller H; Davies EA
Public Health; 2012 Jan; 126(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22153886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International differences in survival from colon cancer: more effective care versus less complete cancer registration.
Prior P; Woodman CB; Collins S
Br J Surg; 1998 Jan; 85(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 9462395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
Brenner H; Jansen L
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Period estimates of cancer patient survival are more up-to-date than complete estimates even at comparable levels of precision.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 16713519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple tumours in survival estimates.
Rosso S; De Angelis R; Ciccolallo L; Carrani E; Soerjomataram I; Grande E; Zigon G; Brenner H;
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1080-94. PubMed ID: 19121933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of population-based cancer survival estimates by trace back of death certificate notifications: an empirical illustration.
Holleczek B; Brenner H
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 48(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 21703847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An empirical evaluation of period survival analysis using data from the Canadian Cancer Registry.
Ellison LF
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16099673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Death certificate only proportions should be age adjusted in studies comparing cancer survival across populations and over time.
Brenner H; Castro FA; Eberle A; Emrich K; Holleczek B; Katalinic A; Jansen L;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 52():102-8. PubMed ID: 26682869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Up-to-date estimates of cancer patient survival even with common latency in cancer registration.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1727-32. PubMed ID: 16985036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370,000 cancer patients in Finland.
Brenner H; Söderman B; Hakulinen T
Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 11980816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
