201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17301102)
1. Evidence from crossover trials: empirical evaluation and comparison against parallel arm trials.
Lathyris DN; Trikalinos TA; Ioannidis JP
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 36(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 17301102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over.
Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2161-73. PubMed ID: 12210631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of a single dose of phenylephrine 10 mg compared with placebo in adults with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold.
Kollar C; Schneider H; Waksman J; Krusinska E
Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6):1057-70. PubMed ID: 17692721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical evaluation of age groups and age-subgroup analyses in pediatric randomized trials and pediatric meta-analyses.
Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Seto I; Hamm MP; Thomson D; Hartling L; Ioannidis JP; Curtis S; Constantin E; Batmanabane G; Klassen T; Williams K
Pediatrics; 2012 Jun; 129 Suppl 3():S161-84. PubMed ID: 22661763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CD4+ guided antiretroviral treatment interruption in HIV infection: a meta-analysis.
Seminari E; De Silvestri A; Boschi A; Tinelli C
AIDS Rev; 2008; 10(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 19092979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.
Pogue J; Walter SD; Yusuf S
Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 19528133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.
Schumm K; Lam TB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 18951451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analyses of safety data: a comparison of exact versus asymptotic methods.
Vandermeer B; Bialy L; Hooton N; Hartling L; Klassen TP; Johnston BC; Wiebe N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Aug; 18(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 18562399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The place of the crossover design in infertility trials: a maximum likelihood approach.
McDonnell J; Goverde AJ; Vermeiden JP
Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2537-44. PubMed ID: 15459169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
