These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17301313)
1. Medical-process patents. Klein RD N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(7):753-4. PubMed ID: 17301313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical-process patents--monopolizing the delivery of health care. Kesselheim AS; Mello MM N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(19):2036-41. PubMed ID: 17093256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Test based on natural processes cannot be patented, rules US court. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2290. PubMed ID: 22446741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The Supreme Court free genes - economic and legal justifications - impacts on innovation and the healthcare offer]. Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D Med Sci (Paris); 2015 Feb; 31(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 25744269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable. Marshall E Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer. Kintisch E Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle. Marshall E Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. LabCorp v. Metabolite Laboratories: The Supreme Court listens, but declines to speak. Klein RD; Mahoney MJ J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(1):141-9, 4. PubMed ID: 18315767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court decision on patent for HIV test unlikely to set major precedent. Waters H Nat Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):758. PubMed ID: 21738136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property. Supreme Court to review the scope of Monsanto's seed patents. Marshall E Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6120):639. PubMed ID: 23393238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences. Dyer C BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]