228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17301334)
1. A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS.
Levitt H
Trends Amplif; 2007 Mar; 11(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 17301334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital hearing AIDS from the perspective of one consumer/audiologist.
Ross M
Trends Amplif; 2007 Mar; 11(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17301335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of hearing aid technology.
Edwards B
Trends Amplif; 2007 Mar; 11(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 17301336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The master hearing aid.
Curran JR; Galster JA
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):108-34. PubMed ID: 23686682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. History of the technological development of air conduction hearing aids.
Mudry A; Dodelé L
J Laryngol Otol; 2000 Jun; 114(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 10962672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.
Akeroyd MA
Trends Amplif; 2008 Jun; 12(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18567587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.
Van Tasell DJ; Levitt H
Trends Amplif; 2008 Jun; 12(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 18567589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A brief history of audiology at Mayo Clinic.
Olsen WO; Rose DE; Hedgecock LD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2003; 14(4):173-80. PubMed ID: 12940701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [History of hearing perception. Different shapes of hearing aids: from the "cupped hand" to cochlear implants].
Hansson H; Andersson B
Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4891-6. PubMed ID: 8544510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids.
Taylor RS; Paisley S; Davis A
Br J Audiol; 2001 Oct; 35(5):271-88. PubMed ID: 11824530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stuart Gatehouse: a personal appreciation.
Haggard M
Trends Amplif; 2008 Jun; 12(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 18567588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory training.
Jerger J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):536-7. PubMed ID: 16999249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearing aids.
Naylor G
Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 9428031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive hearing science: the legacy of Stuart Gatehouse.
Rönnberg J; Rudner M; Lunner T
Trends Amplif; 2011 Sep; 15(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 21606047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deafness in the 20th century. Evolution of clinical otology, prevention and rehabilitation of hearing defects.
Felisati D
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2007 Feb; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 17601212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing Aid History: From Ear Trumpets to Digital Technology.
Valentinuzzi ME
IEEE Pulse; 2020; 11(5):33-36. PubMed ID: 33064644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A bit of history on standards for acoustical measurements of hearing aids.
Lybarger SF; Preves DA; Olsen WO
Am J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 8(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10499111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons yet to be learned.
Jerger J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):616-7. PubMed ID: 21376002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A historical perspective of hearing tests of peripheral auditory function.
Olsen WO
J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Oct; 1(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 2132605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Dhar S
J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):180-9. PubMed ID: 10941709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
