These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17301481)

  • 1. Comment on On the calculation of the electrostatic potential, electric field and electric field gradient from the aspherical pseudoatom model by Volkov, King, Coppens & Farrugia (2006).
    Spackman MA
    Acta Crystallogr A; 2007 Mar; 63(Pt 2):198-200; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 17301481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the calculation of the electrostatic potential, electric field and electric field gradient from the aspherical pseudoatom model.
    Volkov A; King HF; Coppens P; Farrugia LJ
    Acta Crystallogr A; 2006 Sep; 62(Pt 5):400-8. PubMed ID: 16926487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the calculation of the electrostatic potential, electric field and electric field gradient from the aspherical pseudoatom model. II. Evaluation of the properties in an infinite crystal.
    Weatherly J; Macchi P; Volkov A
    Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv; 2021 Sep; 77(Pt 5):399-419. PubMed ID: 34473095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast analytical evaluation of intermolecular electrostatic interaction energies using the pseudoatom representation of the electron density. III. Application to crystal structures via the Ewald and direct summation methods.
    Nguyen D; Macchi P; Volkov A
    Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv; 2020 Nov; 76(Pt 6):630-651. PubMed ID: 33125348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Density- and wavefunction-normalized Cartesian spherical harmonics for l ≤ 20.
    Michael JR; Volkov A
    Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv; 2015 Mar; 71(Pt 2):245-9. PubMed ID: 25727874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advances in electric field and atomic surface derived properties from experimental electron densities.
    Bouhmaida N; Ghermani NE
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2008 Jul; 10(26):3934-41. PubMed ID: 18688393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Charge density and electrostatic potential analyses in paracetamol.
    Bouhmaida N; Bonhomme F; Guillot B; Jelsch C; Ghermani NE
    Acta Crystallogr B; 2009 Jun; 65(Pt 3):363-74. PubMed ID: 19461147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convergence of electric field and electric field gradient versus atomic basis sets in all-siliceous and Mg substituted phillipsites.
    Larin AV; Sakodynskaya IK; Trubnikov DN
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Nov; 29(14):2344-58. PubMed ID: 18442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some comments and corrections regarding the calculation of electrostatic potential derivatives using the Ewald summation technique.
    Stenhammar J; Trulsson M; Linse P
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 134(22):224104. PubMed ID: 21682504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of electric field for H(-) extraction in a volume-type hydrogen negative ion source.
    Matsumoto Y; Nishiura M; Sasao M; Yamaoka H; Shinto K; Wada M
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Feb; 79(2 Pt 2):02B909. PubMed ID: 18315224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Zero-flux surfaces of the electrostatic potential: the border of influence zones of nucleophilic and electrophilic sites in crystalline environment.
    Mata I; Molins E; Espinosa E
    J Phys Chem A; 2007 Oct; 111(39):9859-70. PubMed ID: 17727276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General methodology to optimize damping functions to account for charge penetration effects in electrostatic calculations using multicentered multipolar expansions.
    Werneck AS; Filho TM; Dardenne LE
    J Phys Chem A; 2008 Jan; 112(2):268-80. PubMed ID: 18095663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance optimization in electric field gradient focusing.
    Sun X; Farnsworth PB; Tolley HD; Warnick KF; Woolley AT; Lee ML
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jan; 1216(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 19081099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tissue engineering with electric fields: investigation of the shape of mammalian cell aggregates formed at interdigitated oppositely castellated electrodes.
    Sebastian A; Venkatesh AG; Markx GH
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Nov; 28(21):3821-8. PubMed ID: 17960834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of transport properties in electric field gradient focusing.
    Humble PH; Harb JN; Tolley HD; Woolley AT; Farnsworth PB; Lee ML
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Aug; 1160(1-2):311-9. PubMed ID: 17481644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of EOF in CE by different ways of application of radial electric field.
    Sázelová P; Kasicka V; Koval D; Prusík Z; Fanali S; Aturki Z
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Mar; 28(5):756-66. PubMed ID: 17315148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nitrile and thiocyanate IR probes: quantum chemistry calculation studies and multivariate least-square fitting analysis.
    Choi JH; Oh KI; Lee H; Lee C; Cho M
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134506. PubMed ID: 18397076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimations of electric field effects on the oxygen reduction reaction based on the density functional theory.
    Karlberg GS; Rossmeisl J; Nørskov JK
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2007 Oct; 9(37):5158-61. PubMed ID: 17878993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Macroscopic electrostatic potentials and interactions in self-assembled molecular bilayers: the case of Newton black films.
    Gamba Z
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Oct; 129(16):164901. PubMed ID: 19045308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioanalytical separations using electric field gradient techniques.
    Meighan MM; Staton SJ; Hayes MA
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Mar; 30(5):852-65. PubMed ID: 19197905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.