These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17301682)
1. Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. Paavilainen P; Arajärvi P; Takegata R Neuroreport; 2007 Jan; 18(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 17301682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of interstimulus interval on sensory gating and on preattentive auditory memory in the oddball paradigm. Can magnitude of the sensory gating affect preattentive auditory comparison process? Ermutlu MN; Demiralp T; Karamürsel S Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan; 412(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17197084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Paavilainen P; Simola J; Jaramillo M; Näätänen R; Winkler I Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 11347880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From objective to subjective: pitch representation in the human auditory cortex. Winkler I; Tervaniemi M; Huotilainen M; Ilmoniemi R; Ahonen A; Salonen O; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Näätänen R Neuroreport; 1995 Nov; 6(17):2317-20. PubMed ID: 8747145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preattentive processing of spectral, temporal, and structural characteristics of acoustic regularities: a mismatch negativity study. Takegata R; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Winkler I Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 11321624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects. Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance. Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Bendixen A; Prinz W; Horváth J; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):1111-9. PubMed ID: 18467129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction. Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Representation of harmonic frequencies in auditory memory: a mismatch negativity study. Zion-Golumbic E; Deouell LY; Whalen DH; Bentin S Psychophysiology; 2007 Sep; 44(5):671-9. PubMed ID: 17608799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Tiitinen H; May P; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6501):90-2. PubMed ID: 7969425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preattentive auditory information processing under exposure to the 902 MHz GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study. Kwon MS; Kujala T; Huotilainen M; Shestakova A; Näätänen R; Hämäläinen H Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Apr; 30(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19140136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity. Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts. Bendixen A; Schröger E Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 18439740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Separate memory-related processing for auditory frequency and patterns. Alain C; Achim A; Woods DL Psychophysiology; 1999 Nov; 36(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 10554587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the failure to detect stimulus deviance during sleep due to a rapid fading of sensory memory or a degradation of stimulus encoding? Sabri M; Campbell KB J Sleep Res; 2005 Jun; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15910509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]