These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302004)

  • 1. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy.
    Bodger JA
    Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court upholds state access to abortion clinic records.
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Sep; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual and reproductive health care for adolescents: legal rights and policy challenges.
    English A
    Adolesc Med State Art Rev; 2007 Dec; 18(3):571-81, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 18453235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advocacy for legal reform for safe abortion.
    Ashenafi M
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15487618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Privacy and the economics of personal health care information.
    Schwartz PM
    Tex Law Rev; 1997 Nov; 76(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11913433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
    Schehr AR
    Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions.
    Kismödi E; de Mesquita JB; Ibañez XA; Khosla R; Sepúlveda L
    Reprod Health Matters; 2012 Jun; 20(39):31-9. PubMed ID: 22789080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinics' bid to withhold abortion files is criticized.
    Wilgoren J
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Mar; ():A15. PubMed ID: 15948331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roe v. Wade is constitutionally unprincipled and logically incoherent: a brief in support of judicial restraint.
    Gerard JB
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2603866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
    Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health information and health insurance.
    MacMillan R
    Health Law Can; 1998 May; 18(4):129-31. PubMed ID: 10181441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.