These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302004)

  • 21. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Kansas' top court limits abortion record search; attorney general's inquiry will continue.
    Rudoren J
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A7. PubMed ID: 16502527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class.
    Colker R
    Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fake abortion clinics: the threat to reproductive self-determination.
    Mertus JA
    Women Health; 1990; 16(1):95-113. PubMed ID: 2309498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A closer look.
    Conner SL
    Ala Med; 1990; 60(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 2239628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High Court overturns Dooling decision ruling Hyde constitutional; HHS discontinues Medicaid financing for abortions.
    Kaunitz K
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Jul; 3(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10297867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion-rights groups look to 1998.
    Serafini MW
    Natl J (Wash); 1998 Jan; 30(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Under the radar.
    Tumulty K; Novak V
    Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NOW v. Scheidler: protecting women's access to reproductive health services.
    Clayton F; Love SN
    Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):967-97. PubMed ID: 10558500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.
    McDonagh EL
    Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In the public interest: disclosing confidential patient information for the health or safety of others.
    Ferris LE
    Health Law Can; 1998 May; 18(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 10181438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. I want my information back: evidentiary privilege following the partial birth abortion cases.
    Silfen M
    J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 15968942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The argument that never ends.
    Simon R
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolving constitutional privacy doctrines affecting healthcare enterprises.
    Krulwich AS; McDonald BL
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(4):491-516. PubMed ID: 12025848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can we rely on the alleged constitutional right to informational privacy to secure genetic privacy in the courtroom?
    Imwinkelried EJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2001; 31(4):926-35. PubMed ID: 11963949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.