151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302338)
1. Duration curve analysis for the assessment of pathogen loading from diffuse sources.
Kim GH; Yoon JY; Kim SW; Choi E
Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(11-12):345-52. PubMed ID: 17302338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffuse and point pollution impacts on the pathogen indicator organism level in the Geum River, Korea.
Kim G; Choi E; Lee D
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Nov; 350(1-3):94-105. PubMed ID: 16227076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water quality of runoff from agricultural-forestry watersheds in the Geum River Basin, Korea.
Kim G; Chung S; Lee C
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Nov; 134(1-3):441-52. PubMed ID: 17294267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi.
Liu Z; Hashim NB; Kingery WL; Huddleston DH
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 20390869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linking on-farm dairy management practices to storm-flow fecal coliform loading for California coastal watersheds.
Lewis DJ; Atwill ER; Lennox MS; Hou L; Karle B; Tate KW
Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Aug; 107(1-3):407-25. PubMed ID: 16418926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The River Ruhr - an urban river under particular interest for recreational use and as a raw water source for drinking water: The collaborative research project "Safe Ruhr" - microbiological aspects.
Strathmann M; Horstkott M; Koch C; Gayer U; Wingender J
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2016 Oct; 219(7 Pt B):643-661. PubMed ID: 27495908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial source tracking to identify human and ruminant sources of faecal pollution in an ephemeral Florida river.
Chase E; Hunting J; Staley C; Harwood VJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 113(6):1396-406. PubMed ID: 22963043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Status and trends of fecal indicator bacteria in two urban watersheds.
Petersen TM; Suarez MP; Rifai HS; Jensen P; Su YC; Stein R
Water Environ Res; 2006 Nov; 78(12):2340-55. PubMed ID: 17243234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survey of coastal inland pollution sources and their influence on seawater quality in Doam bay, Korea.
Suh J; Shin S; Kahng HY; Ahn S; Lee YS; Jung JS
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Sep; 190(10):605. PubMed ID: 30251083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fecal coliform accumulation within a river subject to seasonally-disinfected wastewater discharges.
Mitch AA; Gasner KC; Mitch WA
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4776-82. PubMed ID: 20580053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative catchment profiling to apportion faecal indicator organism budgets for the Ribble system, the UK's sentinel drainage basin for Water Framework Directive research.
Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Kay D; Greaves J; Wither A; Watkins J; Francis C; Humphrey N; Bradford M
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):535-50. PubMed ID: 18082929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The seasonality of fecal coliform bacteria pollution and its influence on closures of shellfish harvesting areas in Mississippi Sound.
Chigbu P; Gordon S; Tchounwou PB
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2005 Aug; 2(2):362-73. PubMed ID: 16705840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of human and animal fecal contamination after rainfall in the Han River, Korea.
Kim JY; Lee H; Lee JE; Chung MS; Ko GP
Microbes Environ; 2013; 28(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 23666535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.
Stumpf CH; Piehler MF; Thompson S; Noble RT
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4704-15. PubMed ID: 20673947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray method.
Aulenbach BT
Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Feb; 161(1-4):147-59. PubMed ID: 19165613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the distribution of fecal indicator bacteria in a river system depending on different types of land use in the southern watershed of the Baltic Sea.
Gotkowska-Płachta A; Gołaś I; Korzeniewska E; Koc J; Rochwerger A; Solarski K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Mar; 23(5):4073-85. PubMed ID: 25869433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of in-stream reservoirs to reduce bacterial contamination of rural watersheds.
Gannon VP; Duke GD; Thomas JE; Vanleeuwen J; Byrne J; Johnson D; Kienzle SW; Little J; Graham T; Selinger B
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Sep; 348(1-3):19-31. PubMed ID: 16162311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
