These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302781)

  • 41. The probability distribution of the number of loci indicating exclusion in a core set of STR markers.
    Calafell F
    Int J Legal Med; 2000; 114(1-2):61-5. PubMed ID: 11197631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Y-chromosome short tandem repeats analysis to complement paternal lineage study: a single institutional experience in Taiwan.
    Liu HM; Chen PS; Chen YJ; Lyou JY; Hu HY; Lin JS; Tzeng CH
    Transfusion; 2007 May; 47(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 17465959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Establishment of paternity testing system using microsatellite markers in Chinese Holstein.
    Tian F; Sun D; Zhang Y
    J Genet Genomics; 2008 May; 35(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 18499071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Considerations for the interpretation of STR results in cases of questioned half-sibship.
    Allen RW; Fu J; Reid TM; Baird M
    Transfusion; 2007 Mar; 47(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 17319834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multistep microsatellite mutation in a case of non-exclusion parentage.
    Liu YX; Zhang WQ; Jia YS; Zhang L; Zhou FL; Mei K; Huang DX; Yi SH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():205-207. PubMed ID: 25661235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Usefulness and cogency of gene probes in paternity questions (Personal experiences: 1989/90].
    Speiser P; Fischer G; Pickl WF; Fae I; Pausch V; Kribitz M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1990 Nov; 102(22):673-6. PubMed ID: 1980178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [A method to calculate the probability of paternity between relatives--a paternity case where the putative father was a deceased granduncle].
    Ishitani A; Minakata K; Ito N; Nagaike C; Morimura Y; Hirota T; Hatake K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 50(3):182-9. PubMed ID: 8752991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Paternity investigation among known false trios: ABO, Rh, MNSs, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and HLA systems.
    Salaru NN
    J Forensic Sci; 1993 Nov; 38(6):1482-7. PubMed ID: 8263491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The inadequacy of using the autosomal STR markers for the establishment of the kinship in the parent-child pairs].
    Kovtun PA; Kuklev MIu; Lapenkov MI; Plakhina NV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 25474915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combining autosomal and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat data in paternity testing with male child: methods and application.
    Ayadi I; Mahfoudh-Lahiani N; Makni H; Ammar-Keskes L; Rebaï A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1068-72. PubMed ID: 17645485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genetic relationships among four minorities in Guangxi revealed by analysis of 15 STRs.
    Deng Q; Xu L; Gong J; Zhou L; Li S; Deng X; Luo G; Xie X
    J Genet Genomics; 2007 Dec; 34(12):1072-9. PubMed ID: 18155619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating DNA tests of motherless cases using a Philippine genetic database.
    De Ungria MC; Frani AM; Magno MM; Tabbada KA; Calacal GC; Delfin FC; Halos SC
    Transfusion; 2002 Jul; 42(7):954-7. PubMed ID: 12375670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data.
    Neff BD; Repka J; Gross MR
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Jun; 59(4):315-31. PubMed ID: 11560451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Paternity probability in the cases of incest].
    Minakata K; Ishitani A; Ito N; Nagaike C; Morimura Y; Hatake K; Suzuki O
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 50(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 8752985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Chromosome heteromorphism analysis in cases of disputed paternity.
    Olson SB; Magenis RE; Rowe SI; Lovrien EW
    Am J Med Genet; 1983 May; 15(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 6574701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Verification of private paternity analysis at the Institutes of Legal Medicine in Greifswald, Jena, and Kiel].
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Simeoni E; Poetsch M; Banaschak S; Mályusz V; Schwark T
    Arch Kriminol; 2008; 222(5-6):152-61. PubMed ID: 19216365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dead man talking: sustained utility of data from archaic paternity tests.
    Wenk RE; Chiafari FA
    Transfusion; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1259-61. PubMed ID: 19309469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mutation rates at 14 STR loci in the population from Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil.
    de Andrade ES; Gomes AV; Raposo G; Mauricio-da-Silva L; Silva Rdos S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):e141-3. PubMed ID: 19647702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Spreadsheets of a conventional application software for calculation of plausibility of paternity: application to parentage testing with highly polymorphic markers in deceased party].
    Aoki Y; Hashiyada M; Morioka A; Nata M; Sagisaka K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1997 Jun; 51(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 9301224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.