These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302781)

  • 61. Allele frequency distribution at 15 autosomal STR loci in Panggi, Komkar and Padam sub tribes of Adi, a Tibeto-Burman speaking population of Arunachal Pradesh, India.
    Krithika S; Trivedi R; Kashyap VK; Vasulu TS
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 17306594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Possible pitfalls in motherless paternity analysis with related putative fathers.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Mályusz V; Simeoni E; Lignitz E; Poetsch M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):92-7. PubMed ID: 16143476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping.
    Slavov GT; Howe GT; Gyaourova AV; Birkes DS; Adams WT
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3109-21. PubMed ID: 16101777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. 15 STR loci frequencies with mutation rates in the population from Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil.
    Chula FG; Rodenbusch R; Schumacher S; Grandi T; Michelon CT; Gastaldo AZ; Costi C; Carvalho B; da Silva CM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):e35-8. PubMed ID: 19215864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Paternity testing with genetic markers: are Y-linked genes more efficient than autosomal ones?
    Chakraborty R
    Am J Med Genet; 1985 Jun; 21(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 3860007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. 15 STR loci frequencies in the population from Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil.
    Ocampos M; Fernandes RC; Latorre AF; da Silva CM; Korndorfer FP; Giamarusti Ade C; Menezes ME
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):e129-31. PubMed ID: 19647698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [A study on paternity testing with 96 autosomal SNPs].
    Lee L; Wang L; Feng QC; Zhu YL; Cheng XL; Kong XD; Huang YM; Wang WF; Zeng ZS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22311487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Parentally imprinted allele typing at a short tandem repeat locus in intron 1a of imprinted gene KCNQ1.
    Xu HD; Naito E; Dewa K; Fukuda M; Sumi H; Yuasa I; Yamanouchi H
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2006 May; 8(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 16516529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs.
    Amorim A; Pereira L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 May; 150(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15837005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():128-33. PubMed ID: 25113577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A single mutation in the FGA locus responsible for false homozygosities and discrepancies between commercial kits in an unusual paternity test case.
    Ricci U; Melean G; Robino C; Genuardi M
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Mar; 52(2):393-6. PubMed ID: 17316238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Racing pigeon identification using STR and chromo-helicase DNA binding gene markers.
    Lee JC; Tsai LC; Kuan YY; Chien WH; Chang KT; Wu CH; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Dec; 28(23):4274-81. PubMed ID: 18041042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association.
    Curtis D
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():49. PubMed ID: 17640352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Mutations of short tandem repeat loci in Identifiler system].
    Zhao ZM; Liu Y; Lin Y
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 23(4):290-1, 294. PubMed ID: 17896523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Genetic polymorphism analysis of 8 short tandem repeat loci on the X chromosome in Luoba population of China].
    Kang LL; Ma YM; Gao F; Yu B; Li SB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):479-81. PubMed ID: 17680550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. CPI distribution and cutoff values for duo kinship testing.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    Chin J Physiol; 2007 Oct; 50(5):232-9. PubMed ID: 18274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A case study of SNPSTR efficiency in paternity testing with locus incompatibility.
    Ye Y; Luo H; Liao L; Zhang J; Wei W; Wang Z; Hou Y
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():72-5. PubMed ID: 24528583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. South Australian Aboriginal sub-population data for the nine AMPFlSTR Profiler Plus short tandem repeat (STR) loci.
    Taylor DA; Henry JM; Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):e27-30. PubMed ID: 19083800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Polymorphisms of 11 Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat loci in Chongqing Tujia ethnic group and genetic relationships with 16 populations].
    Shi MS; Bai RF; Wan LH; Yu XJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 25(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 18683156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.