266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17302954)
1. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recursive relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins from finite mixture random regression models.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5474-86. PubMed ID: 20965363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score in Canadian Holsteins from simultaneous and recursive random regression models.
Jamrozik J; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1216-33. PubMed ID: 20172242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic parameters of milking frequency and milk production traits in Canadian Holsteins milked by an automated milking system.
Nixon M; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Hand K; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3422-30. PubMed ID: 19528620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic analysis of milk production traits of polish black and white cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models.
Strabel T; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3152-63. PubMed ID: 16840632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 12146495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of multiple-trait finite mixture model to test-day records of milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Oct; 127(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 20831560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic evaluation for somatic cell score with a test day model for multiple lactations.
Reents R; Dekkers JC; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 1995 Dec; 78(12):2858-70. PubMed ID: 8675768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits.
Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands.
de Roos AP; Harbers AG; de Jong G
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2693-701. PubMed ID: 15328295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a test day model for dairy goat milk yield across lactations in Germany.
Zumbach B; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Peters KJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Jun; 125(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18479266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle.
Cole JB; Null DJ
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2248-58. PubMed ID: 19389984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of autoregressive covariance structures for test-day records of Holstein cows: estimates of parameters.
Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jul; 88(7):2632-42. PubMed ID: 15956325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
