These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Stein RJ; Gill IS; Desai MM Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Mar; 8(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 17303020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathophysiology and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Williams B; Tareen B; Resnick MI Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Mar; 8(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 17303015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Rukin NJ; Ashdown DA; Patel P; Liu S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Mar; 89(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17346411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter. el-Nahas AR Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Mar; 8(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 17303017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy. Hoenig DM; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; McDougall EM; Smith D; Clayman RV J Endourol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 9607438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty: face to face. Banerjee GK; Ahlawat R; Dalela D; Kumar RV Eur Urol; 1994; 26(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 7713125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty. Faerber GJ; Ritchey ML; Bloom DA J Urol; 1995 Oct; 154(4):1495-7. PubMed ID: 7658575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction. Strother MC; Mucksavage P Curr Urol Rep; 2016 May; 17(5):39. PubMed ID: 26968419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults. Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]