128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303062)
1. The macular automated photostress test.
Dhalla MS; Fantin A; Blinder KJ; Bakal JA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 17303062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Macular photostress testing: sensitivity and recovery with an automated perimeter.
Dhalla MS; Fantin A
Retina; 2005; 25(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 15689810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by scanning laser polarimetry-variable corneal compensation.
Chen HY; Huang ML; Tsai YY; Hung PT; Lin EJ
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 18344755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a five-degree visual field between two programs of different testing field range.
Fujimoto N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):866-7. PubMed ID: 17452172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
Miglior S; Riva I; Guareschi M; Di Matteo F; Romanazzi F; Buffagni L; Rulli E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 17707327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of automated perimetry in diagnosis of macular diseases].
Sobolewski P; Słomska J; Pieńkowska-Machoy E; Janecki J; Sabasiński K
Klin Oczna; 1999; 101(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10581891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flicker perimetry losses in age-related macular degeneration.
Phipps JA; Dang TM; Vingrys AJ; Guymer RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3355-60. PubMed ID: 15326161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison among Humphrey field analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the evaluation of macula in primary open angle glaucoma.
Oztürk F; Yavas GF; Küsbeci T; Ermis SS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 18344757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Garway-Heath DF; Fogagnolo P; García-Feijoo J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 49(7):3018-25. PubMed ID: 18378581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing retinal thickness measurements using automated fast macular thickness map versus six-radial line scans with manual measurements.
Taban M; Sharma S; Williams DR; Waheed N; Kaiser PK
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):964-70. PubMed ID: 19410954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study.
Leung CK; Cheung CY; Weinreb RN; Qiu Q; Liu S; Li H; Xu G; Fan N; Huang L; Pang CP; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1257-63, 1263.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19464061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
