129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303062)
21. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of catch trial methods used in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19092457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time.
Wolffsohn JS; Anderson SJ; Mitchell J; Woodcock A; Rubinstein M; Ffytche T; Browning A; Willbond K; Amoaku WM; Bradley C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 16547321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability, normative data, and the effect of age-related macular disease on the Eger Macular Stressometer photostress recovery time.
Bartlett H; Davies LN; Eperjesi F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):594-9. PubMed ID: 15491488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Longitudinal cohort study of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. IV. Visual field results at baseline.
Gordon LK; Monnet D; Holland GN; Brézin AP; Yu F; Levinson RD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):829-837. PubMed ID: 17937923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.
Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structure-function relationship is stronger with enhanced corneal compensation than with variable corneal compensation in scanning laser polarimetry.
Mai TA; Reus NJ; Lemij HG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1651-8. PubMed ID: 17389496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The illuminated high contrast macular grid: a pilot study.
Achiron LR; Witkin NS; McCarey B; Primo S
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):693-7. PubMed ID: 8576534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation in primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Liu CJ; Cheng CY; Hsu WM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1334-9. PubMed ID: 18201763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Chauhan BC; Lieberman MF; Cunliffe I; Hyman L; Leske MC
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1557-65. PubMed ID: 18378317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation of macular function with retinal thickness in nonproliferative type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia.
Charbel Issa P; Helb HM; Holz FG; Scholl HP;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):169-175. PubMed ID: 17981256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An application of threshold-versus-intensity functions in automated static perimetry.
Herse P
Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 15610750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating retinal function in age-related maculopathy with the ERG photostress test.
Binns AM; Margrain TH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2806-13. PubMed ID: 17525216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
