293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303226)
1. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical hysterectomy in obese women.
Soisson AP; Soper JT; Berchuck A; Dodge R; Clarke-Pearson D
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):940-3. PubMed ID: 1448264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical significance of blood transfusion at the time of radical hysterectomy.
Eisenkop SM; Spirtos NM; Montag TW; Moossazadeh J; Warren P; Hendrickson M
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 2359556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: experience with "the Tokyo method".
Ranade RG; Damale UB
Indian J Cancer; 1991 Jun; 28(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 1937554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D vision improves outcomes in early cervical cancer treated with laparoscopic type B radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Scaffa C; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Ditto A
Tumori; 2017 Jan; 103(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 27716879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists.
Covens A; Rosen B; Gibbons A; Osborne R; Murphy J; DePetrillo A; Lickrish G; Shaw P; Colgan T
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8244172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Jensen JK; Lucci JA; DiSaia PJ; Manetta A; Berman ML
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 8244174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yalcin Y; Yalcin SE
Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(11):640-644. PubMed ID: 31802464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retroperitoneal radical hysterectomy.
Delgado G; Potkul RK; Dolan JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 7896184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood transfusion for radical hysterectomy before and after the discovery of transfusion-related human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Benjamin I; Barakat RR; Curtin JP; Jones WB; Lewis JL; Hoskins WJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):974-8. PubMed ID: 7970480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy.
Nezhat F; Nezhat CH; Admon D; Gordon S; Nezhat C
J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Mar; 180(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 7874341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative autologous blood collection and autotransfusion in the surgical management of early cancers of the uterine cervix.
Connor JP; Morris PC; Alagoz T; Anderson B; Bottles K; Buller RE
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 7651645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: A case matched control study.
Gallotta V; Conte C; Federico A; Vizzielli G; Gueli Alletti S; Tortorella L; Pedone Anchora L; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; D'Indinosante M; Pelligra S; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 44(6):754-759. PubMed ID: 29422253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Results in 44 cases].
Mage G; Wattiez A; Chapron C; Canis M; Pouly JL; Pingeon JM; Bruhat MA
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 1385601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomies in the surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
Lampé R; Póka R
Orv Hetil; 2017 Sep; 158(36):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 28868914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
