152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303229)
21. Trimodal spectroscopy for the detection and characterization of cervical precancers in vivo.
Georgakoudi I; Sheets EE; Müller MG; Backman V; Crum CP; Badizadegan K; Dasari RR; Feld MS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 186(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 11904594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Relationship between cervical lesions and the type-specific viral load of high risk HPV reflected by the Ct value of Cobas 4800 HPV system].
Duan LF; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Zhao MF; Men HJ; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):458-463. PubMed ID: 31365958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study.
Huh WK; Cestero RM; Garcia FA; Gold MA; Guido RS; McIntyre-Seltman K; Harper DM; Burke L; Sum ST; Flewelling RF; Alvarez RD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15167826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia.
Brown BH; Tidy JA; Boston K; Blackett AD; Smallwood RH; Sharp F
Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9207):892-5. PubMed ID: 10752706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Near-infrared-excited confocal Raman spectroscopy advances in vivo diagnosis of cervical precancer.
Duraipandian S; Zheng W; Ng J; Low JJ; Ilancheran A; Huang Z
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):067007. PubMed ID: 23797897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion clinically significant?
McHale MT; Souther J; Elkas JC; Monk BJ; Harrison TA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 17415112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of colposcopy in the diagnostic setting compared with the screening setting.
Cantor SB; Cárdenas-Turanzas M; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Nogueras-Gonzalez GM; Beck JR; Follen M; Benedet JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18165387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diffuse reflectance patterns in cervical spectroscopy.
Marín NM; Milbourne A; Rhodes H; Ehlen T; Miller D; Benedet L; Richards-Kortum R; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S116-20. PubMed ID: 16165197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic performance, human papillomavirus testing, and follow-up results.
Srodon M; Parry Dilworth H; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16136595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Not Available].
Betschart C; Ghisu GP; Fink D
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2016 Nov; 105(23):1363-1369. PubMed ID: 27854170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of downstaging in the detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India.
Basu P; Sankaranarayanan R; Mandal R; Roy C; Das P; Choudhury D; Datta K; Karamakar S; Tsu V; Chakrabarti RN; Siddiqi M;
Int J Cancer; 2002 Jul; 100(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 12115593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visualization techniques (colposcopy, direct visual inspection, and spectroscopic and other visual methods). Summary of task force 7.
Wright TC; Menton M; Myrtle JF; Chow C; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 12365209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cytological & colposcopic evaluation in premalignant & early malignant lesions of the cervix.
Singh V; Verma K; Bhargava VL
Indian J Med Res; 1983 Jul; 78 Suppl():54-9. PubMed ID: 6654431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix.
Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Bilgiç R; Cakar Y; Eren S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 15823114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Value of 4-quadrant biopsies under colposcopy for detecting precancerous lesions in cervical cancer screening].
Zhao Y; Song Y; Zhao F; Zhang W; Li L; Chen F; Chen W; Pan Q; Shen G; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 37(11):875-9. PubMed ID: 26887523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term observational approach in women with histological diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: an Italian multicentric retrospective cohort study.
Ciavattini A; Serri M; Di Giuseppe J; Liverani CA; Gardella B; Papiccio M; Delli Carpini G; Morini S; Clemente N; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e024920. PubMed ID: 31272971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
Ge Y; Christensen P; Luna E; Armylagos D; Schwartz MR; Mody DR
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cytological findings of precancerous lesion and early cancer in the uterine cervix (author's transl)].
Kurihara S
Rinsho Byori; 1976; 24(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 988262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Reliability of the CINtec p16INK4a immunocytochemical test in screening cervical precancerous lesions].
Jović M; Nenadić D; Magić Z; Zoltarevski L; Durdević-Vukomanović B; Tatomirović Z; Strelić N; Vojvodić D
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2008 Mar; 65(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18494269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
