594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303984)
21. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Oztaş K; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; Thomas M
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10226203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population.
Reinders A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 16932038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 IntelliSense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Anwar YA; Giacco S; McCabe EJ; Tendler BE; White WB
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Aug; 3(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 10212364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C.
Cotte UV; Faltenbacher VH; von Willich W; Bogner JR
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in the elderly.
Altunkan S; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can wrist blood pressure oscillometer be used for triage in an adult emergency department?
Rutschmann OT; Sarasin FP; Simon J; Vermeulen B; Riberdy L; Pechere-Bertschi A
Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 16046950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.
Graves JW; Nash C; Burger K; Bailey K; Sheps SG
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):823-7. PubMed ID: 14704726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard ausculatory method using a mercury manometer.
Mufunda J; Sparks B; Chifamba J; Dakwa C; Matenga JA; Adams JM; Sparks HV
Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Aug; 42(8):230-2. PubMed ID: 8990566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
