These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17303984)

  • 41. Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure in general practice: the 'inverse white-coat' response.
    Turnbull SM; Magennis SP; Turnbull CJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):221-3. PubMed ID: 14694700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
    de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society.
    Modesti PA; Costoli A; Cecioni I; Toccafondi S; Carnemolla A; Serneri GG
    Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 10226204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Validation of the Microlife BPA100 Plus device for self-home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Neofytou MS; Adamopoulos DN
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16702824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
    Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
    Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
    Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Blood pressure measurement in an ambulatory setting: concordance between physician and patient self-measurement.
    Vinyoles E; Blancafort X; López-Quiñones C; Arqué M; Brau A; Cerdán N; de la Figuera M; Díaz F; Pujol E
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jan; 17(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12571616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of home blood pressure-monitoring devices, Omron HEM-1020 and Omron i-Q132 (HEM-1010-E), according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
    Takahashi H; Yoshika M; Yokoi T
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Aug; 16(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 21701384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus).
    Wilton A; Shabeeh H; Cuckson C; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 16702825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validation of the Oregon scientific BPW810 blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension Protocol.
    Li L; Hui W; Jin Lan W
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Dec; 11(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 17106319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional.
    Asmar R; Khabouth J; Mattar J; Pecchioli V; Germano G
    J Hypertens; 2010 Mar; 28(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 20087217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
    Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
    Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
    J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.