642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17304413)
1. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging.
Ricci P; Cantisani V; Ballesio L; Pagliara E; Sallusti E; Drudi FM; Trippa F; Calascibetta F; Erturk SM; Modesti M; Passariello R
Ultraschall Med; 2007 Feb; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17304413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of low-mechanical index CEUS in the differentiation between low and high grade bladder carcinoma: a pilot study.
Drudi FM; Cantisani V; Liberatore M; Iori F; Erturk SM; Cristini C; Di Pierro G; D'Ambrosio U; Malpassini F; De Felice C; Di Leo N
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 20449795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasonography contrast media Levovist and power Doppler in the study of the breast. Methodology, vascular morphology and automatic enhancement quantification with wash-in and wash-out curves].
Menna S; Di Virgilio MR; Burke P
Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 10478204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.
Jia WR; Chai WM; Tang L; Wang Y; Fei XC; Han BS; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 24794865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumors using kinetic features of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Wilczek B; Celebioglu F; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced low MI real time ultrasound and SonoVue].
Hohmann J; Skrok J; Puls R; Albrecht T
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12811698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic features of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver.
Piscaglia F; Venturi A; Mancini M; Giangregorio F; Vidili G; Magnolfi F; Mirarchi M; Fornari F; Bolondi L
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 19941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a retrospective study.
Ooi CC; Low SC; Schneider-Kolsky M; Lombardo P; Lim SY; Abu Bakar R; Lo RH
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Oct; 54(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 20958940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Jiang YX; Liu H; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q; Chang XY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1873-81. PubMed ID: 17686569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macromolecular contrast medium (feruglose) versus small molecular contrast medium (gadopentetate) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Daldrup-Link HE; Kaiser A; Helbich T; Werner M; Bjørnerud A; Link TM; Rummeny EJ
Acad Radiol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):1237-46. PubMed ID: 14626298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-cystic breast lesions using external perfusion software.
Jung EM; Jung F; Stroszczynski C; Wiesinger I
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17677. PubMed ID: 34480040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prospective analysis of quantification of contrast media enhanced power Doppler sonography of equivocal breast lesions].
Pudszuhn A; Marx Ch; Malich A; Fleck M; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 12677504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
