These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17305308)

  • 1. Quantitative measurements of the strength of adhesion of human neutrophils to a substratum in a microfluidic device.
    Gutierrez E; Groisman A
    Anal Chem; 2007 Mar; 79(6):2249-58. PubMed ID: 17305308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion.
    Lu H; Koo LY; Wang WM; Lauffenburger DA; Griffith LG; Jensen KF
    Anal Chem; 2004 Sep; 76(18):5257-64. PubMed ID: 15362881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell culture chip using low-shear mass transport.
    Liu K; Pitchimani R; Dang D; Bayer K; Harrington T; Pappas D
    Langmuir; 2008 Jun; 24(11):5955-60. PubMed ID: 18471001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration.
    Cheng SY; Heilman S; Wasserman M; Archer S; Shuler ML; Wu M
    Lab Chip; 2007 Jun; 7(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 17538719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vascular mimetics based on microfluidics for imaging the leukocyte--endothelial inflammatory response.
    Schaff UY; Xing MM; Lin KK; Pan N; Jeon NL; Simon SI
    Lab Chip; 2007 Apr; 7(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 17389960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A microfluidic device for depositing and addressing two cell populations with intercellular population communication capability.
    Lovchik RD; Tonna N; Bianco F; Matteoli M; Delamarche E
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Apr; 12(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 20013313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separation of plasma from whole human blood in a continuous cross-flow in a molded microfluidic device.
    VanDelinder V; Groisman A
    Anal Chem; 2006 Jun; 78(11):3765-71. PubMed ID: 16737235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of the adhesion strength of fibroblast cells on ethylene glycol terminated self-assembled monolayers by a microfluidic shear force assay.
    Christophis C; Grunze M; Rosenhahn A
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 May; 12(17):4498-504. PubMed ID: 20407724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drug permeability assay using microhole-trapped cells in a microfluidic device.
    Yeon JH; Park JK
    Anal Chem; 2009 Mar; 81(5):1944-51. PubMed ID: 19203200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear stress-dependent cell detachment from temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces in a microfluidic device.
    Tang Z; Akiyama Y; Itoga K; Kobayashi J; Yamato M; Okano T
    Biomaterials; 2012 Oct; 33(30):7405-11. PubMed ID: 22818649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical guide to microfluidic perfusion culture of adherent mammalian cells.
    Kim L; Toh YC; Voldman J; Yu H
    Lab Chip; 2007 Jun; 7(6):681-94. PubMed ID: 17538709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of single-cell adhesion strength using a microfluidic assay.
    Christ KV; Williamson KB; Masters KS; Turner KT
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Jun; 12(3):443-55. PubMed ID: 20213215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated microfluidic culture device for quantitative analysis of human embryonic stem cells.
    Kamei K; Guo S; Yu ZT; Takahashi H; Gschweng E; Suh C; Wang X; Tang J; McLaughlin J; Witte ON; Lee KB; Tseng HR
    Lab Chip; 2009 Feb; 9(4):555-63. PubMed ID: 19190791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matrix-dependent adhesion of vascular and valvular endothelial cells in microfluidic channels.
    Young EW; Wheeler AR; Simmons CA
    Lab Chip; 2007 Dec; 7(12):1759-66. PubMed ID: 18030398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of drug metabolites and cytotoxicity assay simultaneously using an integrated microfluidic device.
    Ma B; Zhang G; Qin J; Lin B
    Lab Chip; 2009 Jan; 9(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 19107278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility and robustness of a real-time microfluidic cell toxicity assay.
    Cooksey GA; Elliott JT; Plant AL
    Anal Chem; 2011 May; 83(10):3890-6. PubMed ID: 21506521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-throughput and high-resolution flow cytometry in molded microfluidic devices.
    Simonnet C; Groisman A
    Anal Chem; 2006 Aug; 78(16):5653-63. PubMed ID: 16906708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlled deposition of cells in sealed microfluidics using flow velocity boundaries.
    Lovchik RD; Bianco F; Matteoli M; Delamarche E
    Lab Chip; 2009 May; 9(10):1395-402. PubMed ID: 19417906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic microfluidic platform for cell separation and nucleus collection.
    Tai CH; Hsiung SK; Chen CY; Tsai ML; Lee GB
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Aug; 9(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 17508288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of shear stress on isolated receptor-ligand interactions of Staphylococcus epidermidis and human plasma fibrinogen using molecularly patterned microfluidics.
    Weaver WM; Dharmaraja S; Milisavljevic V; Di Carlo D
    Lab Chip; 2011 Mar; 11(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 21249255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.