BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1036 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17305692)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
    Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.
    Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture strength of endodontically treated molars transfixed horizontally by a fiber glass post.
    Beltrão MC; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Mota EG; Burnett LH
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19281106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
    Kivanç BH; Görgül G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.