1034 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17305692)
21. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques.
França FM; Worschech CC; Paulillo LA; Martins LR; Lovadino JR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):62-9. PubMed ID: 16127473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
Trope M; Tronstad L
J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars.
Fokkinga WA; Le Bell AM; Kreulen CM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Int Endod J; 2005 Apr; 38(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 15810973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
Solomon CS; Osman YI
SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite.
Hürmüzlü F; Kiremitçi A; Serper A; Altundaşar E; Siso SH
J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):838-40. PubMed ID: 14686819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
