These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17306709)

  • 1. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Dogan S; Schächinger V; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 49(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 17306709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial.
    Ali A; Halstead JC; Cafferty F; Sharples L; Rose F; Coulden R; Lee E; Dunning J; Argano V; Tsui S
    Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1 Suppl):I535-40. PubMed ID: 16820633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.
    Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plasma ANP and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system as new parameters describing the hemodynamics of the circulatory system after implantation of stented or stentless aortic valves.
    Szafranek A; Jasinski M; Kolowca M; Gemel M; Wos S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):702-8; discussion 709. PubMed ID: 17044378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch.
    Kulik A; Burwash IG; Kapila V; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1 Suppl):I553-8. PubMed ID: 16820636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves.
    Del Rizzo DF; Abdoh A; Cartier P; Doty D; Westaby S
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):114-20. PubMed ID: 10660178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.
    Germing A; Lindstaedt M; Holt S; Reber D; Mügge A; Laczkovics A; Fritz M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Aug; 49(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 18665119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass.
    Perez de Arenaza D; Lees B; Flather M; Nugara F; Husebye T; Jasinski M; Cisowski M; Khan M; Henein M; Gaer J; Guvendik L; Bochenek A; Wos S; Lie M; Van Nooten G; Pennell D; Pepper J;
    Circulation; 2005 Oct; 112(17):2696-702. PubMed ID: 16230487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Vrandecic M; Fantini FA; Filho BG; de O; da C; Vrandecic E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V; Di Tommaso L; De Amicis V; Stassano P; Vosa C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
    Thomson HL; O'Brien MF; Almeida AA; Tesar PJ; Davison MB; Burstow DJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 May; 13(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 9663541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Dunning J; Graham RJ; Thambyrajah J; Stewart MJ; Kendall SW; Hunter S
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Oct; 28(19):2369-74. PubMed ID: 17670757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of type of aortic valve prosthesis on coronary blood flow velocity.
    Jelenc M; Juvan KA; Medvešček NT; Geršak B
    Heart Surg Forum; 2013 Feb; 16(1):E8-E14. PubMed ID: 23439362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; DallaTomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 79(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 15680824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sensky PR; Loubani M; Keal RP; Samani NJ; Sosnowski AW; Galiñanes M
    Am Heart J; 2003 Oct; 146(4):E13. PubMed ID: 14564336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.