These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17306854)

  • 1. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing scenes: memory for naturalistic events following change blindness.
    Mäntylä T; Sundström A
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):696-706. PubMed ID: 15724358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intention, attention and long-term memory for visual scenes: It all depends on the scenes.
    Evans KK; Baddeley A
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():24-37. PubMed ID: 29981966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes.
    Liu K; Jiang Y
    J Vis; 2005 Sep; 5(7):650-8. PubMed ID: 16232000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search for changes in scenes creates long-term, incidental memory traces.
    Utochkin IS; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):829-843. PubMed ID: 29427122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance.
    Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How arousal modulates memory: disentangling the effects of attention and retention.
    Sharot T; Phelps EA
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 4(3):294-306. PubMed ID: 15535165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The hippocampus plays a role in the recognition of visual scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time: evidence from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and healthy controls.
    Szamosi A; Levy-Gigi E; Kelemen O; Kéri S
    Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1892-900. PubMed ID: 23266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction.
    Swallow KM; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the influence of task on attention.
    Navalpakkam V; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):205-31. PubMed ID: 15581921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures.
    Intraub H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6242731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):388-403. PubMed ID: 12760623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.
    Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task.
    Mundhenk TN; Einhäuser W; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1620-37. PubMed ID: 19351543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.