BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17309587)

  • 1. Comparison of new and 3-month-old brush heads in the removal of plaque using a powered toothbrush.
    Hogan LM; Daly CG; Curtis BH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 17309587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
    Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
    Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximal brush head used on a powered toothbrush.
    van der Weijden GA; Timmerman MF; Danser MM; Piscaer M; Ijzerman Y; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 15766377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies.
    Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Pioch T; Galustians HJ; Qaqish J; Sharma NC
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11803988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
    Ojima M; Shizukuishi S; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Hanioka T
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of plaque removal efficacy of new and 3-month-old toothbrushes in children.
    Malekafzali B; Biria M; Tadayon N; Abbasi H
    East Mediterr Health J; 2011 Feb; 17(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 21735945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.
    Kaiser E; Thurnay S; Markgraf D; Pack S; Grender J; Hengehold D; Warren PR; Wehrbein H; Erbe C
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 22779281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental plaque removal effectiveness of two powered toothbrushes.
    Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jan; 17 Spec No():8A-12A. PubMed ID: 14998048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating battery-powered toothbrush and a standard manual toothbrush.
    Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Staehle HJ; Pioch T
    Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():25B-28B. PubMed ID: 12003484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of bristle profile on plaque removal efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 12967068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study comparing the plaque removal efficacy of an advanced rotation-oscillation power toothbrush to a new sonic toothbrush.
    Williams K; Rapley K; Huan J; Walters P; He T; Grender J; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(4):154-8. PubMed ID: 19278087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.
    Biesbrock AR; He T; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18578173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
    Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical investigation into the effect of toothbrush wear on efficacy.
    Warren PR; Jacobs D; Low MA; Chater BV; King DW
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 11887515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.
    Williams K; Haun J; Dockter K; Ferrante A; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 14579873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.