These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17310128)

  • 21. A simple and robust TDT-type test against genotyping error with error rates varying across families.
    Cheng KF; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17476111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.
    González JR; Carrasco JL; Dudbridge F; Armengol L; Estivill X; Moreno V
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 18228557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
    Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power and related statistical properties of conditional likelihood score tests for association studies in nuclear families with parental genotypes.
    Li Z; Gastwirth JL; Gail MH
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 May; 69(Pt 3):296-314. PubMed ID: 15845034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robust trend tests for genetic association in case-control studies using family data.
    Tian X; Joo J; Zheng G; Lin JP
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S107. PubMed ID: 16451563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detect and adjust for population stratification in population-based association study using genomic control markers: an application of Affymetrix Genechip Human Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Wong WH
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15367915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies.
    Wray NR; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    Genome Res; 2007 Oct; 17(10):1520-8. PubMed ID: 17785532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations.
    Kraft P; Yen YC; Stram DO; Morrison J; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 17283440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An optimal dose-effect mode trend test for SNP genotype tables.
    Yamada R; Okada Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 18688846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association Analysis under Population Stratification: A Two-Stage Procedure Utilizing Population- and Family-Based Analyses.
    Lin HW; Chen YH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):160-70. PubMed ID: 20029228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robust quantitative trait association tests in the parent-offspring triad design: conditional likelihood-based approaches.
    Wang JY; Tai JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 73(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 19183344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic model testing and statistical power in population-based association studies of quantitative traits.
    Lettre G; Lange C; Hirschhorn JN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 17352422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of assortative mating upon genetic association studies: spurious associations and population substructure in the absence of admixture.
    Redden DT; Allison DB
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 16514473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exact family-based association tests for biallelic data.
    Schneiter K; Laird N; Corcoran C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 16094642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Case-control association studies in mixed populations: correcting using genomic control.
    Shmulewitz D; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):145-53. PubMed ID: 15812171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.