190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17310515)
1. CT screening for lung cancer.
Dehavenon A
N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(7):745-6; author reply 746-7. PubMed ID: 17310515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lung cancer screening debate.
Blum J; Rinne N
Chest; 2003 Feb; 123(2):653; author reply 654-5. PubMed ID: 12576399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CT screening for lung cancer: is smaller better?
Heffner JE; Silvestri G
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2002 Feb; 165(4):433-4. PubMed ID: 11850330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lung cancer screening debate.
Gould MK
Chest; 2003 Feb; 123(2):653-4; author reply 654-5. PubMed ID: 12593410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Black WC
J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 25635704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early Lung Cancer Action Project.
Drury NE; Brown I; Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Delany DJ; Halson P
Lancet; 1999 Oct; 354(9185):1206. PubMed ID: 10513731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lung cancer screening: who will pick up the tab?
Grannis FW
Chest; 2002 May; 121(5):1388-90. PubMed ID: 12006414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost benefits of early detection.
Guntheroth WG
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):639. PubMed ID: 18669840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A High-Value Proposition?
Roth JA; Ramsey SD
JAMA; 2016 Jan; 315(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 26746460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: An Explanation Using Three Different Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening.
Curl PK; Kahn JG; Ordovas KG; Elicker BM; Naeger DM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):344-7. PubMed ID: 26204285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Screening for lung cancer using low dosage computer tomography].
Lähde S
Duodecim; 2004; 120(6):647-8. PubMed ID: 15119225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Large field trial for lung cancer screening: putting the wrong cart before the horse?
Black WC; Aberle DR; Berg CD
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):314-6; discussion 317-8. PubMed ID: 17456862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lung cancer screening trial financed by tobacco-funded foundation, sparks debate.
Twombly R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):690-1. PubMed ID: 18477793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clarifying Assumptions and Outcomes in Cost-effectiveness Analyses.
ten Haaf K; de Koning HJ
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):277-8. PubMed ID: 26869001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clarifying Assumptions and Outcomes in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses--Reply.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):278-9. PubMed ID: 26869003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Will the national lung screening trial be able to demonstrate a mortality reduction?
Yankelevitz DF
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):653; author reply 653-4. PubMed ID: 18227565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Whether and under what conditions FDG-PET might be cost-effective in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules depicted on lung cancer screening in Japan].
Tsushima Y; Aoki J; Endo K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):390-8. PubMed ID: 14587408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic decision analysis model of screening for lung cancer.
Marshall D; Simpson KN; Earle CC; Chu CW
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Sep; 37(14):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11549429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for cancer with computed tomography.
Swensen SJ
BMJ; 2003 Apr; 326(7395):894-5. PubMed ID: 12714453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. CT screening for lung cancer: appearances can be deceiving.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Feb; 4(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 17412234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
